Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Top 5 Defenses of All-Time


5. 2002 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Tampa Bay settled on Raiders coach Jon Gruden in exchange for two first round draft picks (20022003), two second round picks (20022004) and $8 million in cash payments.
Upon his arrival in Tampa Bay, Gruden immediately went to work, acquiring former Jaguars WR Keenan McCardell, and RB Michael Pittman from the Cardinals. The Buccaneers needed to improve their sluggish offense, as the league's sweeping realignment sent them to the new NFC South division, along with AtlantaCarolina and New Orleans.
The offense made slight improvements during the season, but the strength of the team was the defense. The 2002 Buccaneers became the first team to lead the league in total defense, points allowed, and interceptions since the 1985 Chicago Bears. They also held opposing quarterbacks to an unbelievable 48.4 passer rating for the season. The defensive numbers they finished with were eye-popping. 196 points given up, the fifth-lowest total ever in a 16 game season. The second team to ever face at least 500 passing attempts and allow less than 2500 yards. The eleventh team to record a sack and a takeaway in all 16 games they played. A majority of Tampa's opponents didn't even get to 150 passing yards. Led by this dominating defense, the 2002 Buccaneers achieved their most successful season to date. They won the NFC South title with the team's best ever record, 12–4, and then defeated the 49ers in what became coach Steve Mariucci's last game with that franchise. In a surprising upset, Tampa Bay won their first NFC Championship on the road against the Eagles in the last NFL game ever played at Veterans StadiumCornerback Ronde Barber capped off the win by intercepting a Donovan McNabb pass and returning it 92 yards for a touchdown late in the fourth quarter.
The Buccaneers went on to rout Gruden's former team, the Oakland Raiders, by a score of 48–21 in Super Bowl XXXVII. Gruden's familiarity with the Raiders' players and playbook paid off, as John Lynch and other Buccaneer players recognized some of Oakland's formations and plays at crucial points in the game. After opening 3-3, Rich Gannon dropped back to pass 16 times in the first half. Combining the net yardage of the five passes Gannon completed and the two times he took a sack, Oakland gained 33 yards. Two other Oakland throws were intercepted by the Buccaneers. Those were run back for a total of 34 yards. To reiterate: the best passing attack in the NFL was getting out-gained through the air by the defense it was facing. The insulting thing is, pundits claimed the victory couldn't be the result of a historically excellent defense playing at its best, destroying all challengers and rendering even the best offenses impotent. It was a fluke, or luck, or a hustle. It was a weirdly Tampa outcome: to be a champion who wasn't identified as one, doubted when you literally had nothing left to prove.


4. 1991 Philadelphia Eagles 
Game One of the 1991 Season and all the high expectations for a Philadelphia Franchise that was seeking its first Super Bowl Championship. Buddy Ryan had been fired as Head Coach and Rich Kotite took over as the head honcho. On the very first play from scrimmage against the Green Bay Packers in Week #1, Bryce Paup hit Randall Cunningham in the Knee, essentially knocking him out for the season. At this point, most people also thought the Eagles season was over on that play. 
At this point, the 1991 Eagles Defense flexed its muscle and was not going down without a fight. The Eagles lead the league against the pass and rush giving up the fewest yards in both categories. Only the 2002 Tampa Bay Buccaneers had a better pass defense as far as statistics, while only the 2000 Ravens had a better run defense. The 1991 Eagles version was more balanced than both of those teams. The Eagles had a much less competent offense to complement their defense, particularly their running game which when used right can keep the Defense off of the field and refreshed. The Eagles Offense that year also had 43 Giveaways in 1991. So, instead of limiting the other teams offensive opportunities, the Eagles offense actually gave these teams more chances to score. They still only gave up 244 Points, which is an amazing stat considering their enormous amount of turnovers.
Another fact that has to make the Eagles the Number 1 Defense is the fact that the team had the 26th ranked offense and 21st ranked rushing attack that year. Combine that with strength of schedule and you have to seriously consider them as the Number One Defense. That year, the Eagles defense faced 3 Games against Top 3Scoring Offenses and 4 Games against Top 5 Scoring Offenses (Both Scoring/Yards), the Eagles Defense compiled 55 sacks, 26 Interceptions as well as 22 Fumble Recoveries. Reggie White, arguably the Greatest Defensive Player ever to play in the NFL was the anchor of this Eagle’s squad. In 1991, White had 15 Sacks. His counterpart, Clyde Simmons had 13 Sacks. Both Defensive Ends collected 100 Tackles a piece, which is an astounding number for a Defensive End, let alone any two on the same team. At Defensive Tackle, 2 Time Pro Bowler Jerome Brown had 9 Sacks of his own that year and over 50 Tackles.Seth Joyner, who led the Linebacker Corps had 7 Sacks, 6 Forced Fumbles, 3 Interceptions and over 100 Tackles. Byron Evans, his counterpart also had over 100 Tackles for the season. Eric Allen, the leader of the Defensive Backfield, earned his second of six Pro Bowl selections. Andre Waters and Wes Hopkins were the Safeties and no one wanted to face either of them this year. The 1991 Eagles Defense also played in the toughest Division in Football.
The 1991 Eagles Defense led the league in fewest yards allowed against the rush, the pass, and overall. They also led the league in sacks, forced fumbles, and takeaways. Half of the Eagles Total Defense made the 1991 Pro Bowl.According to the DVOA (Defense Adjusted Value Over Average), a system that analyzes efficiency using all sorts of statistical criteria, the Eagles by far had the best Defensive Season when looking at this system. The Eagles Defense scored 20 Total Touchdowns that year, which was FIVE less than the offensive total of 25. That is a huge disparity for anyone that understands football. This defense deserves Top 5 Recognition even in spite of its playoff success. 


(Tie) 3. 2013 Seattle Seahawks


In the Super Bowl, the Seahawks absolutely crushed the Broncos offense that scored the most points in regular-season history. But that was just the finishing touch. They allowed 14.4 points per game in a season when the league average was 23.4. They limited opponents to 5.82 yards per pass attempt in a year when the worst team, the Bucs, averaged 6.19 yards per pass. They were best in the league in points allowed, yards allowed, takeaways and opponent passer rating.
"Not only did they perform at the Super Bowl, but they performed all year against a variety of different offenses and good quarterbacks, at home and on the road," Fisher said. "For them to line up and play the 49ers the way they did, with the versatility of that offense, the commitment of the run game and the mobility of the offense, that was impressive."
If the Seahawks defense had played a decade ago the way its did in 2013, it would not have been as impressive. But the advances in offensive football gave the 2013 Seahawks defense unquestioned credibility. "What they did stands out because of the way rule changes have affected offense," said Ravens general manager Ozzie Newsome, who played against the Steel Curtain and the Bears in the mid-'80s and put together the 2000 Ravens. "More scoring, the rules favor that. Back in the day, corners could absolutely beat guys up."
The challenges the Seahawks overcame are part of what defined them. "I think it's one of the best defenses ever, but it's hard to compare," said former Cowboys personnel executive Gil Brandt, who has been associated with the NFL since 1960. "The '85 Bears, they played against 'Red' and 'Brown.' There weren't a lot of formations and motion and all of that. Football was simpler than it is now. It was man on man, so to speak. With all of the offensive looks now, it's harder. But I think if this defense had played in 1985 or any year, it would have been pretty good."
The argument also could be made that defensive football has regressed in recent years. New rules limiting offseason preparation and in-season practices have led to a poor tackling epidemic. But the Seahawks went against the trend. "The thing that is outstanding about Seattle is they are very, very good tacklers," Hall of Fame coach Bill Parcells said. "The majority of them are good tacklers. They particularly tackle well in the secondary. That is a place where poor tackling shows up. Not there."
Regardless of where their overall defense ranks, the Seahawks might be able to lay claim to the title of best secondary ever. Hall of Fame quarterback Warren Moon, who serves as the color analyst for Seahawks games on the radio, said he has not seen a better secondary in his 30-year association with the NFL. Some may prefer the 1994 49ers (Deion Sanders, Eric Davis, Merton Hanks, Tim McDonald). Others may pick the 1984 49ers (Ronnie Lott, Eric Wright, Carlton Williamson, Dwight Hicks). Still others will like the1984 Raiders (Mike Haynes, Lester Hayes, Vann McElroy, Mike Davis) But with Richard Sherman, Earl Thomas and Kam Chancellor all being voted All-Pro, the 2013 Seahawks secondary was as effective as any.
The Seahawks secondary plays differently than many of the other great secondaries and most other current ones. These DBs try to interfere with the route running of receivers, both at the line and beyond. "That secondary is well put together, and the cornerbacks get away with holding," Lewis said, echoing a common refrain. "They didn't hold in the Super Bowl, but they did it all year long. They play the game very aggressively."
The Seahawks may be on the borderline of legal coverage. But they are aware of what they are doing. "They know they will be penalized some because of how they play, but the number of penalties they get are worth it when you compare them to the number of plays they make," Moon said. "They push the rules to the limit to their benefit."
Moon rates the Seahawks overall defense with the 1985 Bears and the 2000 Ravens as the best he ever has seen. "With all three, their physicalness and intensity stand out," Moon said. "They never let up the whole game. A lot of that had to do with special players like Ray Lewis with the Ravens, Mike Singletary with the Bears and Earl Thomas and Kam Chancellor with the Seahawks."
What we can be sure of is this is one of the best collections of big, athletic, skilled players in history. The Seahawks are pretty special in that regard.
The Seahawks defense could be better positioned to overcome personnel losses than most defenses, however. They were so well coached by Pete Carroll, and as a result are one of the most fundamentally sound defenses in the league. Their system appears to be at least as significant as the players who execute it. They have better depth than most, and a willingness to use it.
General manager John Schneider and his staff have excelled at finding players who fit the parameters of Carroll's defense, and Carroll and his staff has excelled at developing players and defining roles that get the most out of individuals. Super Bowl MVP Malcolm Smith was a seventh-round pick. Sherman and Chancellor were fifth-round picks. No one can assume these players would have excelled in other defenses.
Compared to the other defenses in their class, the Seahawks defense was not star-studded. They had only three players voted to the Pro Bowl. Seven of the nine other top-10 teams had more.
"Coaching has a ton to do with who this defense is," Moon said. "A lot of it is the combination of their size and athleticism and intensity. But then you look at how they have used the talent. They take an inside player like Red Bryant and make him a 325-pound end. Not many people would do that. … You look at how Pete makes this team practice. I've never seen a team go at each other during the regular season like this. They go really hard, so that by the time the game gets here it's just a formality. These players have been conditioned this way since they got to Seattle." 
The defense led the league in points allowed (231), yards allowed (4,378) and takeaways (39), the first team to lead all three categories since the 1985 Chicago Bears.
Avril and Clemons each had 28 quarterback hurries; on the other side, non-Leo defensive end Michael Bennett had 8.5 sacks, 17 quarterback hits and 39 hurries. (Bennett's pass-rushing prowess grades out at 20.9, third-best among 4-3 defensive ends, according to Pro Football Focus.) The three combined for 21 sacks, but even if they weren't taking down the quarterback, they were forcing his throws, which helps contribute to the Hawks' league-leading turnover rate (20.1 percent of drives, a ridiculous number). 

That pressure interlocked with the Seahawks' incredible pass defense. Despite losing hard-hitting, six-foot-four cornerback Brandon Browner to an indefinite suspension during the regular season, Seattle's secondary remained intimidating. Richard Sherman is one of the best man defenders in the league, allowing just 0.77 yards per coverage snap—second-best behind Darrelle Revis—and a ridiculous 18.3 coverage snaps per reception (translation: for roughly every 18 times Sherman is in coverage, he gives up one reception).
Sherman also led the league with eight interceptions. Hell, the whole secondary was an INT machine. Safeties Earl Thomas and Kam Chancellor create a brutal last line of defense, with eight picks and three forced fumbles combined. On the other side, Byron Maxwell's filled in for Browner, with a respectable 0.90 yards per coverage snap and four picks in only 304 snaps. Maxwell is a bit smaller than the linebacker-like Browner, but he's done a solid job in his new starting role. Interception totals tend to be inconsistent and hard to predict, but there's little doubt that the ones Seattle's got in 2013 owe a lot to the pressure created up front.

(Tie) 3. 2015 Denver Broncos 
Pound-for-pound, statistic-for-statistic, the ’85 Bears, the ’00 Ravens and the ’13 Seahawks may come out looking better than the ’15 Broncos, but maybe “best” isn’t the question we should be asking.
The question we should be asking is: Are the 2015 Denver Broncos the most-important defense in NFL history? And if that’s the question, then the answer is a resounding yes. In fact, the Denver defense may be the most-important unit, offense or defense, the league has ever seen.
And the case all starts with this stat: 14 of the Denver Broncos’ 19 games were decided by seven points or less, and they went an eye-popping 11-3 in those games, an NFL record.
Of the three other defenses in question, only the ’13 Seahawks (6-3) came close to reaching double digit games decided by a touchdown or less; the ’00 Ravens (4-2) and ’85 Bears (2-0) were quite used to a comfortable lead.
Why is that? Because they had offenses that carried at least some portion of the load, if not a good deal of it.
That was not the case with the Broncos, who only had one victory all season by more than two scores; the Bears (12), the Ravens (8) and Seahawks (8), though, spent the majority of their season blowing opponents out. In fact, in their Super Bowl appearances, both the Bears and Seahawks scored 40-plus points, and the Ravens put up 34.
It may sound odd to say, but none of those three teams needed an all-time great defense; really, they just needed a good-to-great defense, because they all had competent offenses backing them up — top-10 offenses in the cases of Chicago and Seattle.
Not only did the Broncos not have a competent offense; they had an offense that consistently put the defense in losing situations (stats courtesy of Football Outsiders).
Denver’s offense went three-and-out on .276 percent of their drives (30th in the NFL), they threw an interception on .120 percent of their drives (31st in the NFL) and took an average time of 2:32 off the clock; all of that led to the Denver defense being tasked with stopping 195 drives (most in the NFL) with an average starting position of the Broncos’ 29.5-yard line (29th in the NFL).
And despite all those odds being stacked against them, the Denver defense still gave up the least amount of points per drive in the league (1.43).
Neither the Seahawks (5th fewest turnovers/drive; 16th fewest 3-and-outs/drive; 6th best opponent’s starting field position) nor the Ravens (8th fewest turnovers/drive; 9th fewest 3-and-outs/drive; 2nd best opponent’s starting field position) were tasked with overcoming such incompetent offensive performances, and while FO’s stats only go back as far as 1997, the fact that the Bears offense was second best in the NFL should give you some idea of how much help was given to their defense.
And while I think it’s a bit unfair to bring strength of schedule into the equation — you can only play the teams lined up in front of you — it’s worth looking at.
According to FO, the average DVOA of the Broncos’ opponents was 4.1 (8th most-difficult in the league), while the Seahawks’ opponents came in at 0.4 (16th most-difficult), and the Ravens’ opponents came in at -4.8 (24th most-difficult). That’s the difference between facing the Vikings, Raiders or Texans for 16 games, respectively.
The Bears, again, came before FO’s time, so we can’t compare apples to apples, but it is fair to note that they only played five playoff teams during the regular season, while the Broncos faced seven.
All this is to say that no defense has had a bigger impact on a championship than this Denver Broncos group. Sure, pound for pound, you could make the argument that other units have been better, but none have meant more.
This year’s Broncos led the NFL in yards allowed (283.1), pass yards allowed (199.6) and sacks (52) while becoming just the fourth defense since 1970 to lead the league in both net yards per pass (5.1 YPA) and yards per rush (3.3 YPA).
The sort of transformation from 2013 to 2015 is remarkable. After losing to Seattle in Super Bowl XLVIII, Denver added three Pro Bowl players in outside linebacker DeMarcus Ware, cornerback Aqib Talib and safety T.J. Ward the following offseason. Denver then added safety Darian Stewart in March, and it has turned nose tackle Sylvester Williams and linebacker Brandon Marshall — role players on the 2013 Broncos — into starters. As a result, the 2015 Broncos defense doesn’t look or feel all that similar to the 2013 one. Only Von Miller (who missed seven games because of injury or suspension in 2013), Chris Harris Jr., Malik Jackson, Danny Trevathan and Derek Wolfe played at least 45 percent of the team’s snaps in both 2013 and 2015; of course, that’s a pretty excellent core to build around. And the Broncos added defensive coordinator Wade Phillips, long respected as one of the game’s top defensive minds. 
This adage of defense carrying the team was perfectly displayed in Super Bowl 50. The Broncos pounded Cam Newton, just as they did Tom Brady in the AFC title game, on the way to a 24-10 upset victory Sunday night. Denver collected seven sacks for 68 yards, recovered three fumbles, intercepted a pass and scored a touchdown.The Broncos managed only 11 first downs and 194 yards against the Panthers and scored their lone touchdown to cap a late 4-yard drive set up by the defense.
So Denver coach Gary Kubiak put the game on the shoulders of Phillips and his defense. That defense was on the field for almost 33 minutes and a staggering 75 plays but slammed the door shut on the best offense in the game, holding the Panthers to a season-low 10 points, 21 below their average. That relentless pass rush sacked Newton a season-high six times and rattled him into an 18-of-41 passing performance.
"We knew the challenge coming into the game," Ware said. "We believed we were up to that challenge."
On Carolina's second possession of the game, Miller beat right tackle Mike Remmers on a speed rush and buried Newton from the front side for an 11-yard sack and more -- a fumble that bounced into the end zone where defensive end Malik Jackson fell on it for a touchdown and a 10-0 lead. It was the sixth defensive touchdown of the season for the Broncos, who won all six of those games.
It was an omen of things to come. And just about every Bronco had a hand in the slaughter. Safety T.J. Ward and linebacker Danny Trevathan also recovered fumbles. Ward intercepted the pass. Miller had 21/2 sacks, Ware two, Stewart and cornerback Chris Harris one apiece and end Derek Wolfe a half sack. Miller also forced two fumbles that led to both Denver touchdowns.
Since 1970, the NFL's No. 1-ranked defense has reached the Super Bowl 14 times. Denver improved the record of those defenses to 12-2 in this game. The Broncos became just the third team in history to reach the Super Bowl with both the No. 1 defense and a 50-sack pass rush, joining those 1985 Bears and the 2008 Steelers. All won Super Bowls.
Defense wins championships in the NFL. Still.
Trailing 16-10 with 4:51 remaining in the game, Newton trotted on the field for what loomed as his legacy drive. He was in position to march the Panthers the length of the field for a potential game-winning touchdown. But the Broncos were not about to let that happen.
On third-and-9 from the 25, Newton stood in the pocket but as he started to step into a throw, Miller knocked the ball out of his hand from the back side for a strip sack. The ball bounced toward the Carolina goal line where Ward pounced on it at the 4. Four plays later, C.J. Anderson plowed into the end zone for Denver's only offensive touchdown, the game clincher. What might tip the scales to this Denver defense are the teams it beat in the postseason to win it all. The Broncos beat the Steelers, Patriots and Panthers. They were the first-, third- and fourth-best scoring teams in the league. That's Ben Roethlisberger, Tom Brady and Newton, this year's MVP, in successive games. In three postseason games, the Broncos defense turned up the pressure. They had seven takeaways, 33 Quarterback Hits, 13 Sacks, and 25 passes defensed.

Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 7.22.32 PM.png
Against Pittsburgh, Denver forced two fumbles (recovered one), sacked Roethlisberger three times, and held the Steelers to one touchdown and 16 points. Keeping in mind the Steelers were missing their top target in wide receiver in Antonio Brown, this performance will likely be the least memorable of the Broncos’ run to the Super Bowl. 
Still, that is saying a lot when only allowing 16 points to the fourth ranked offense is the worst of the bunch. 
Going up against the defending Super Bowl champs New England Patriots, the Denver defense literally crushed Tom Brady and the Patriots high powered offense. In 61 drop backs, the Broncos sacked Brady four times, hitting him another 16 times.  
To put that in perspective, no quarterback had taken that many hits in any game this NFL season. Denver forced two interceptions and held the Patriots to 18 points- their second lowest total of the entire season.
Former New England Patriot great Rodney Harrison said he’s never seen a defense take it to Tom Brady like the Broncos did in the AFC championship game.
On the biggest stage, facing the number one scoring offense in the league in Carolina, the Broncos had their best performance of the year. Denver’s defense forced four turnovers, recorded seven sacks, scored the game’s first touchdown, and held the Panthers to ten points and 315 total yards. In other words, complete and total domination.
In the playoffs, against three of the best NFL offenses the Broncos defense allowed 14.6 points per game, and averaged 2.3 turnovers, 4.6 sacks, and allowed only four total touchdowns. 
Here is how the Broncos playoff run stacks up against the averages of the other aforementioned greatest championship defenses.

Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 7.24.44 PM.png
*Ravens played four playoff games, did not have first round bye

Clearly the 1985 Bears and 2000 Ravens had the best performances in the playoffs and should be considered one and two, respectively, as the best defenses of all time. But compared to the other greats, the 2015 Broncos have every right to be in the conversation.
Denver averaged more sacks in their playoff run than every team except the Bears, and were nearly identical in points allowed to the Seahawks and Buccaneers. 
When taking into account offensive opponents faced in the playoffs, the Broncos run is even more impressive. By looking at the offensive production of the opponents these defenses faced in the playoffs we can see that the Denver defense faced the second toughest matchups, only behind the 2013 Seahawks.
Below is a chart that averages the offensive points scored by the opponents these top defenses faced in the playoffs.
(For example, the 2013 Seahawks played the New Orleans Saints- 25.875 PPG, the San Francisco 49ers-25.375 PPG, and the Denver Broncos- 37.875 PPG. Add up the opponents offenses PPG and divide by three- for the divisional round, championship game, and Super Bowl- and you get the opponent’s point total average of 29.7.)


Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 7.26.12 PM.png
*Ravens played four playoff games, did not have first round bye 

What this shows is how good the offenses were that these teams faced on the road to the Super Bowl. 
Ironically, Denver would have had the most impressive run against top offensive opponents if Seattle did not play, off all teams, the 2013 Denver Broncos offense that scored a record 606 points and averaged 37.87 points per game in the 2013 regular season- which inflated the total point average of the opponents the Seahawks faced in the playoffs. 
Of all these great defensive teams, the 2015 Denver Broncos is the only team to face opponents in the playoffs that were in the top five in scoring offense during the regular season. As great as the 2000 Ravens and 1985 Bears were, they did not play against offenses of the caliber that Denver had to play this postseason.
Not only were the offenses that Denver faced elite, but they were playing with their own offense that was statistically one of the worst to win a Super Bowl. 
Despite having Peyton Manning as their starting quarterback and weapons like DeMaryius Thomas and Emmanuel Sanders on the outside, the Broncos offense did no favors for their defense in the Super Bowl- and for that matter, most of the year. The Broncos offense in 19 games only scored a total of 36 touchdowns, which is tied for the lowest touchdown total of any Super Bowl Champion with the Trent Dilfer led 2000 Ravens’ offense. Yikes.
And in the biggest game of the year, Manning and Denver pretty much laid an egg. The Broncos only managed one touchdown and 194 total yards- the lowest output in Super Bowl history. In short, Denver was literally carried to victory by their defense and that was the case all season long.

2. 2000 Baltimore Ravens 
The 2000 Baltimore Ravens defense was superior in nearly every way. In records. In attitude. And, yes, in the Super Bowl itself.
Ray Lewis was the game's best defensive player that season, running sideline to sideline to make plays. In the middle, Sam Adams and Tony Siragusa formed a 700-pound wall inside. On the edges, Peter BoulwareMichael McCrary and Rob Burnett took out quarterbacks on a weekly basis. In the secondary, future Hall of Fame defender Rod Woodson teamed up with two first-round picks, Chris McAlister and Duane Starks, to turn interceptions into touchdowns.
The Ravens posted four shutouts in 2000, the most since the 1976 Steel Curtain defense in Pittsburgh. They allowed the fewest points ever (165) over a 16-game schedule and the fewest rushing yards (60.6 a game), too. Both records still stand today. Before you say that was a different era with different rules, more offenses averaged over 30 points per game in 2000. The Ravens allowed just 10.3 points per game, surrendered 247.9 yard per game and had 49 turnovers on the season. The Ravens forced 26 fumbles and had 26 recoveries. There were 14 different players with at least one fumble recovery and eight with at least one interception. 
Beyond the numbers, the Ravens imposed their will on opposing offenses. Teams gave up running the ball on Baltimore, and Cincinnati running back Correy Dillon once refused to go back into a game against Baltimore. Did anyone quit like that against the Seahawks? And if you thought Richard Sherman's trash talking was bad, the Ravens would tell teams all week that they were going to shut teams out then did.
Where the Ravens truly made their mark was in the playoffs. Baltimore's defense gave up one touchdown in four postseason games. The Ravens limited the Broncos, the second-highest scoring team that season (30.3 points), to a field goal. They held the Raiders, the third-highest scoring team (29.9), to a field goal. In 16 quarters in the postseason, the Ravens allowed a total of 16 points.
The Ravens' performance in the Super Bowl was phenomenal, and the numbers back it up. They held the New York Giants to 152 yards. Baltimore picked off four passes, returning one for a touchdown. The Ravens are one of three teams in Super Bowl history not to allow an offense score a point and the only one since the Pittsburgh Steelers did it January 1975. The only points scored against the Ravens in their 34-7 win over the Giants came off a kickoff return for a touchdown.
Some downgrade the Ravens' accomplishments because it was against Kerry Collins. The Giants, though, were coming off an NFC Championship Game in which they scored 41 points. If you're going to hold Collins against the Ravens, you have to credit them for winning with Trent Dilfer as their quarterback. The best way to show the Ravens' dominance on defense is this: Baltimore won a Super Bowl despite Dilfer completing less than half of his passes -- 47.9 percent, to be exact -- in the playoffs.

(Tie) 1. 1985 Chicago Bears 
Yards allowed: 258.4 per game (first in the NFL). Points allowed: 12.4 per game (first).
Bill Parcells said this is the best defense he's ever faced. The Bears trampled offenses in the regular season before going on an astonishing playoff run in which they shut out the Giants (21-0) and Rams (24-0), then beat the Patriots by 36 points in Super Bowl XX -- during which they held New England to 7rushing yards. Between coordinator Buddy Ryan and a unit that included some really good players -- defensive ends Dan Hampton and Richard Dent, linebackers Mike Singletary and Otis Wilson and safeties Dave Duerson and Gary Fencik -- Chicago's defense won with both superior scheming and superior talent, collecting 34 interceptions, forcing 54 takeaways and 64 sacks. Not for nothing, Chicago's point differential of 258 remains the fifth-best mark since 1970. Chicago did benefit from having the No. 1 rushing attack that season, which helped limit the amount of time the defense spent on the field. But the bottom line is, the Bears shut people down by relying on man coverage, blitzing a lot and taking away the run. People really couldn't do anything against them.

(Tie) 1. 1976 Pittsburgh Steelers 
The team started 1–4 and saw quarterback Terry Bradshaw injured in the week 5 loss to the Cleveland Browns after a vicious sack by Joe "Turkey" Jones that has since become immortalized in NFL Films as part of the Browns-Steelers rivalry.
Despite the setbacks, the Steelers would turn it around behind the strength of the Steel Curtain and its dual threat at running back in Franco Harris and Rocky Bleier, who each rushed for over 1000 yards, finishing 10–4 and posting five shutouts. Rookie quarterback Mike Kruczek wound up going 6–0 starting in place of Bradshaw, largely due to the strength of the ground game. This would also stand as an NFL record for best start for a rookie quarterback until 2004—when the Steelers' own Ben Roethlisberger more than doubled that record and went 13–0 as a starter his rookie season. This was all possible because of the Best Defense in NFL History. 
In 2007, ESPN.com named the 1976 Steelers the greatest defense in NFL history, noting, "the 1976 unit was the best. Here's why: 28. That's how many points the Steel Curtain surrendered in the last nine games of the season. That's a total. As a result, Pittsburgh, which started the season 1–4, made it all the way to the AFC Championship Game.... The '76 Steelers didn't have it easy – their opponents had a.528 winning percentage. But they had these guys: Hall of Famers Mean Joe Greene, Jack Lambert, Jack Ham and Mel Blount. And eight Steelers defensive players made the 1976 Pro Bowl team: cornerback J.T. Thomas, defensive end L.C. Greenwood, Greene, Ham, Lambert, defensive back Glen Edwards, safety Mike Wagner, and Blount."
The team needed to win nine straight to make the playoffs.  They did, surrendering 28 points TOTAL over the season's last nine games, with five shutouts in that span.  Opponents went: 6-0-0-0-3-16-3-0-0.  This team allowed a total of two touchdowns over a nine week period.  Process that. This team, which outscored opponents by a ridiculous 342-138 (almost 2.5-1) had no business going into the playoffs. For the year they were #1 overall (237.4 y/pg) gave up just 138 points and held 7 of 8 straight opponents to 10 points or less. Five of those came by shutout and the first modern team to record 3 in a row. In fact they only allowed 2 touchdowns in the last 10 games and those came in the same game. A 32-16 win over the Oilers. They had a string of 25 quarters where they didn’t allow a touchdown. They were so good they had to be legislated out of business. 

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Top 18 Games of Peyton Manning's Career


This will definitely be the hardest post yet. But I'll give it my best shot.


18. Week 9 2002 at Philadelphia
18/23 (78.3%) 319 yards (13.9 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 158.3 Passer Rating



17. Week 8 2006 at Denver
32/39 (82.1%) 345 yards (8.8 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 129.2 Passer Rating


16. Week 3 2013 vs Oakland
32/37 (86.5%) 374 yards (10.1 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 135.8 Passer Rating


15. Week 16 2008 at Jacksonville
29/34 (85.3%) 364 yards (10.7 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 140.7 Passer Rating


14. Week 12 2004 at Detroit
23/28 (82.1%) 236 yards (8.4 ypa) 6 TDs 0 int 141.4 Passer Rating


13. Wildcard Playoffs 2003 vs. Denver
22/26 (84.6%) 377 yards (14.5 ypa) 5 TDs 0 int 158.3 Passer Rating


12. Divisional Playoffs 2003 at Kansas City
22/30 (73.3%) 304 yards (10.1 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 138.8 Passer Rating


11. Week 4 2003 at New Orleans
20/25 (80%) 314 yards (12.6 ypa) 6 TDs 0 int 158.3 Passer Rating


10. Wildcard Playoffs 2004 vs. Denver
27/33 (81.8%) 458 yards (13.9 ypa) 4 TDs 1 int 145.7 Passer Rating, 1 Rushing TD


9. AFC Championship Game 2013 vs. New England
32/43 (74.4%) 400 yards (9.3 ypa) 2 TDs 0 int 118.4 Passer Rating


8. Week 6 2012 at San Diego
24/30 (80%) 309 yards (10.3 ypa) 3 TDs 1 int 129.0 Passer Rating


7. Week 5 2013 at Dallas
33/42 (78.6%) 414 yards (9.9 ypa) 4 TDs 1 int 129.6 Passer Rating, 1 Rushing TD


6. Week 9 2005 at New England
28/37 (75.7%) 321 yards (8.7 ypa) 3 TDs 1 int 117.1 Passer Rating


5. Week 1 2013 vs Baltimore
27/42 (64.3%) 462 yards (11.0 ypa) 7 TDs 0 int 141.1 Passer Rating


4. AFC Championship Game 2009 vs. New York Jets
26/39 (66.7%) 377 yards (9.7 ypa) 3 TDs 0 int 123.6 Passer Rating


3. Week 5 2003 at Tampa Bay
34/47 (72.3%) 386 yards (8.2 ypa) 2 TDs 1 int 101.9 Passer Rating


2. Week 10 2009 vs. New England
28/44 (63.6%) 327 yards (7.4 ypa) 4 TDs 2 int 97.4 Passer Rating


1. AFC Championship Game 2006 vs. New England
27/47 (57.4%) 349 yards (7.4 ypa) 1 TD 1 int 79.1 Passer Rating, 1 Rushing TD

Friday, April 22, 2016

Top 5 QBs of All-Time


(Tied) 5.  Joe Montana 
San Francisco 49ers, 1979-92; Kansas City Chiefs, 1993-94
40,551 yards, 273 TD, 139 INT, 92.3 rating
The standard by which postseason greatness is judged today, Joe Montana directed the 49ers to four Super Bowl wins, without throwing an interception in any of the four games: 83/122, 1142 yards, 11 TDs, no picks — plus 105 yards and 2 TDs on the ground. Projected to a 16-game season, Montana's Super Bowl performances would yield 4,568 yards, 44 touchdowns, still no interceptions, 420 rushing yards, and 8 rushing TDs.
Montana earned three Super Bowl MVPs for his work, but he was often as effective in the earlier rounds of the playoffs as he was with a ring on the line. Consider the playoffs of the 1989 season. In a 41-13 win over the NFC Central champion Vikings, Montana passed for four touchdowns and a 142.5 rating. The next week, in the NFC Championship Game, he completed 26 of 30 passes, for 262 yards and 2 TDs. In Super Bowl XXIV, 297 yards, 5 TDs, 147.6 rating. Montana also led the Chiefs to two of their few postseason wins under Marty Schottenheimer (2-2 with Montana, 1-5 without him). Altogether, his teams were a combined 16-7 in postseason play, including four Super Bowls.
Something often forgotten or ignored about Montana's career is that he was also one of the greatest regular-season quarterbacks of all time. He led the NFL in touchdowns and passer rating twice each, and he passed for the most yards of the 1980s. He and Dan Marino were the only players with six 3,000-yard passing seasons in the decade, and the only two with 200 TD passes. Montana set the all-time record for passer rating, plus he excelled in areas that don't show up in the rating formula — he was a good runner, he didn't take many sacks, and he seldom fumbled. Montana made eight Pro Bowls and five all-pro squads, three of them first-team. He was the Associated Press NFL MVP in 1989 and '90.
Montana checks all the boxes. He had a long, productive career, during which he was regularly regarded as the finest QB in the game. He was smart, accurate, versatile, and extraordinarily calm under pressure. His regular-season stats are superb, and he was the greatest quarterback in Super Bowl history.

(Tied)5.Tom Brady
New England Patriots, 2000-15
58,028 yards, 428 TD, 150 INT, 96.4 rating
Like John Elway or Roger Staubach, a multiple Super Bowl loser famous for his clutch play. Tom Brady’s career has something to please everyone. He has career milestones like 400 TDs and 50,000 yards. He has four Super Bowl rings and three Super Bowl MVPs. He’s been regular season MVP twice, he’s thrown for 5,000 yards in a season, 50 TDs in a season, a 117.2 passer rating, led the NFL in Passer Rating twice and TD passes four times. No matter what measure you prefer, Tom Brady is one of the greatest quarterbacks ever to play.
Brady spent a few years throwing to Randy Moss and Wes Welker, and Rob Gronkowski could become the greatest tight end of all time if he stays healthy. But for much of his career, Brady has played with no-name receivers. Sometimes he’s had a running game, and sometimes not. For most of the last decade, there have been questions about New England’s defense. No matter who else is on the team, Bill Belichick and Brady find ways to succeed. Such dramatic shifts in approach are not unprecedented, but they’re very rare.
I really don’t have anything negative to say about Tom Brady, but I suppose I need to explain why he “only” ranks fifth — and in particular, some readers will require me to explain why I rank Brady beneath Peyton Manning.
Let’s begin with the Manning comparison. I think most fans would agree that Brady and Manning have been roughly equal from 2005-15. During those years, Manning was 120-33 as starter, compared to 124-37 for Brady, w/ 12-8 record in the playoffs for Brady compared to an 11-7 playoff record for Manning. Peyton has 2 Super Bowl victories to Brady's 1 (and each has two Super Bowl losses), with one Super Bowl MVP each (Brady’s others came prior to ’05). It’s hard to find much difference there. Likewise with passing stats:
Okay, so we’re agreed that there’s not much difference over the last 10 seasons up until 2015. Yet even with a terrible 2015 campaign thrown in, the numbers are nearly identical, TD:INT Ratio/Differential is the only statistic in which Brady comes out ahead. Even being technical, prior to Peyton missing the next 6 games he was still outpacing Brady (323 to 319) in TDs. The question then becomes whether Brady was a greater QB, from 2001-04, than Manning from 1998-2004.
The answer is no. Through ’04, Brady made two Pro Bowls and won two Super Bowl MVP Awards. Manning made five Pro Bowls and won two NFL MVP Awards. Brady passed for almost 14,000 yards, Manning for almost 30,000. Manning had six 4,000-yard seasons, Brady none. Manning broke the single-season records for TDs (49) and passer rating (121.1), while Brady’s single-season highs were 28 and 92.6, respectively. Manning had a perfect passer rating (158.3) in a playoff game, which Brady has never done, and led a 21-point comeback in the final five minutes of a Monday Night Football game against the defending Super Bowl champions, which no one else has done.
For their careers, Brady has thrown fewer completions, with a lower completion percentage. Many fewer yards, and fewer yards per attempt. Fewer touchdowns, and a lower TD%. More sacks for more yards, and many more fumbles. He does have a lot fewer interceptions and a better INT%. He’s less wild than Manning, and he doesn’t seem to get rattled or frustrated as easily.
It’s to Brady’s credit that he’s played well without elite receivers, but it’s also true that he hasn’t looked like the best in the game without weapons like Moss and Gronkowski. (60.9% completion rate, 1.9 TD:INT Ratio, 86.9 Passer Rating w/o both players) That doesn’t apply to Manning. Edgerrin James left, and the Colts won the Super Bowl. Marvin Harrison retired, and Manning won NFL MVP. And then we all said, well, okay, but it’s not like Reggie Wayne is chopped liver. So Manning overcame a career-threatening neck injury, switched to an entirely different team, with entirely new receivers, and set single-season records for yardage and TDs. Eric Decker left in free agency and Welker got suspended, so Manning turned Emmanuel Sanders into a Pro Bowler. Every receiver Manning plays with turns into a superstar. I just don’t know how you look at these two QBs and conclude that Brady is more critical to his team than Manning. It doesn’t match up in the eye test, the passing stats, the receivers, or the team results. When Brady missed the 2008 season, the Patriots still went 11-5. When Manning missed the 2011 season, the Colts dropped to 2-14.
Tom Brady has been one of the best QBs in the league for over a decade. He’s passed for 50,000 yards, over 400 TDs, and he’s never thrown 15 or more INTs in any season. He holds several postseason records, he’s started in six Super Bowls, 10 AFC Championship Games, quarterbacked four Super Bowl winners, and won three Super Bowl MVPs. He’s an obvious Hall of Famer, a great quarterback by any measure. The idea that he’s the greatest ever — better than his contemporary Manning, or better than fellow four-time champion Joe Montana — I think represents incomplete, over-simplified analysis or recency bias. The idea that Brady might be the best QB in Super Bowl history is absurd: Joe Montana and Terry Bradshaw, at least, are comfortably ahead of him. Brady is still a good player, and it’s likely he will rise on this list before his career is over. 

4. Dan Marino
Miami Dolphins, 1983-99
61,361 yards, 420 TD, 252 INT, 86.4 rating
When Dan Marino retired, he held the career records for pass completions, yards, and touchdowns, all of them by a huge margin. He also held dozens of records for things like 300-yard passing games and 4,000-yard seasons, plus significant single-season records for passing yards (5,084) and TDs (48).
It isn't just that Marino set the records; he put them far out of reach, and they stood for decades. No one came within 200 yards of Marino's single-season record for 24 years. When Drew Brees finally broke it more than a quarter-century later (2011), he threw almost 100 more passes than Marino, and he did it with the benefit of new rules that make passing easier. The TD record was even more impressive: when Marino threw 48 TDs, he broke the existing record ... of 36. Two years later, he threw 44. Until the new illegal contact policy in 2004, Marino still had more 40-TD seasons than every other player in history combined, including the top two of all time.
The career marks, since broken by Brett Favre then later by Peyton Manning, were equally unthinkable. Marino retired with nearly 10,000 more yards than 2nd-place John Elway (51,475) and nearly 25% more TDs than Fran Tarkenton (342). Marino made nine Pro Bowls and six Associated Press all-pro Teams, including three straight years first-team all-pro (1984-86).
Marino's 1984 season, when he set the yardage and TD records, might be the best season in NFL history, by any player at any position. The Dolphins went 14-2, and Marino won NFL MVP (ahead of Eric Dickerson, who rushed for 2,105 yards). Marino threw 3 TDs in a playoff win over the Seahawks and Defensive Player of the Year Kenny Easley, then 421 yards and 4 TDs in a 45-28 AFC Championship victory over the Steelers. The Dolphins lost Super Bowl XIX, but everyone in football knew that Marino, just 23, would win multiple championships.
It didn't work out that way. The Dolphins, dynastic in the '70s and early '80s, failed to restock their roster when stars like Dwight Stephenson and Doug Betters retired, and Hall of Fame coach Don Shula (now 30 years into his coaching career) finally lost his edge. In his Pro Football Historical Abstract, Sean Lahman wrote a lengthy defense against the idea that Marino wasn't a winner. Lahman noted that the Dolphins ranked in the bottom half of NFL teams in rushing yards in 15 out of Marino's 17 seasons. They never ranked better than 13th, and only once had a running back reach the 1,000-yard mark. Miami also had a subpar defense in those years; in Marino's 10 playoff losses, the Dolphins gave up an average of 34.5 points. How can you expect to win when your defense allows five touchdowns?
Lahman concluded, and I agree, that Marino "helped a team that wasn't very good—and at times was downright lousy—to remain competitive. He led them to the AFC Championship Game in 1985, for example, with a 22nd ranked defense [out of 28] and the 18th ranked rushing offense. That team finished 12-4, and rather than blaming Marino for not taking them further, I think we ought to commend him for even getting them into the playoffs." Marino set the postseason record for consecutive games with a touchdown pass, and retired with more postseason TDs than anyone but Joe Montana.
With a less-than-stellar supporting cast for most of his career, Marino shouldered the load. He led the NFL in completions six times, yardage five times, and TDs three times. He retired with the 2nd-most wins as starting quarterback, leading the Dolphins to 10 playoff appearances, five AFC East titles, three AFC Championship Games, and a Super Bowl. He is also the best passer in history at avoiding sacks. Famously slow, he had great pocket awareness and an incredibly quick release. His 3.13% sack percentage is slightly worse than Peyton Manning's 3.07%, but Marino played in an era when QBs took more sacks. Drew Brees (3.87%) is somewhat close to Manning, but none of Marino's contemporaries are anywhere near his mark. Brett Favre (4.9%) took over 50% more sacks per attempt, but his number is better than Troy Aikman (5.2), Dan Fouts (5.4), Joe Montana (5.5), Warren Moon (6.29), Jim Kelly (6.33), John Elway (6.6), Steve Young (7.9), et al. Phil Simms (9.3) and Randall Cunningham (10.1) actually took three times as many sacks as Marino. He led the NFL in lowest sack percentage 10 times, and saved his team hundreds of yards by getting rid of the ball rather than taking the sack.
Marino was accurate at any range, and he had possibly the quickest release of all time. He ran a brilliant two-minute drill, and pioneered the fake spike. He had arguably the greatest single season in history, and he set every careerpassing record, far out of reach of his contemporaries. He was a perennial all-star and he repeatedly got otherwise mediocre teams into the postseason.

Marino vs. Montana
I have gone back and forth many times on whether Marino or Montana was the better player. The truth is, I think it's too close to call, and extremely difficult to know where we should draw the lines; they played in such different situations. Joe Montana was the perfect quarterback for what Bill Walsh was doing in San Francisco, but would he have been equally successful elsewhere? Would Marino seem as impressive if he'd played on a team with a good defense and a power running game? I suspect that if they had switched places, both teams would have fared worse.
The argument over these two players is often defined as a regular-season vs. postseason distinction: Marino set the records, Montana won the rings. That's a lazy approach to a complex question. You can't define Montana solely by his four Super Bowls. He was an eight-time Pro Bowler, two-time regular season MVP, and his stats are sensational. Labeling Marino as the guy with the stats and no titles ignores that American football is the ultimate team sport. Marino played on two teams that had a legit shot at a championship, in 1984 and '85, and those only because he was the best QB in the league. For the rest of his career, Marino dragged mediocre teams kicking and screaming into the postseason.
I also think that, out of respect for a legend, people tend to gloss over Don Shula's reputation as a choker. Shula's Colts were favored to win the 1964 NFL Championship Game against Cleveland. They got shut out, 27-0. They were huge favorites to win Super Bowl III, a team that was already regarded by many as the greatest in history. They lost to Joe Namath and the Jets. Shula went to Miami, and the '71 Dolphins became the first team in Super Bowl history not to score a touchdown. The undefeated '72 Dolphins were underdogs in Super Bowl VII, partly because of Shula's reputation. His failure to win a title in 20 seasons with John Unitas and Dan Marino is sort of astonishing, and it seems unlikely that the quarterbacks were primarily to blame for that drought.

3. Otto Graham
Cleveland Browns, 1946-55
23,584 yards, 174 TD, 135 INT, 86.6 rating
As with Dan Marino and Joe Montana, I really don't know how to rank Otto Graham and John Unitas. Ask me today, and I have Graham behind. Two weeks ago, he wasn't. Before that, it was Unitas again. It's really close.
Graham was the more dominant quarterback, without question. His stats are just as good, he was all-pro every year, and his team went to the league championship game every season — literally, 10 times in 10 years. They won seven of the 10, and Graham was even more exceptional on the big stage than Unitas. But Unitas played longer, and Graham dominated smaller and less developed leagues, in which it was easier to stand out.
Graham started off as a basketball player; he was the sixth man for the Rochester Royals (who later became the Sacramento Kings), and didn't play pro football until he was 24. Legendary coach Paul Brown recruited Graham to play for his new team in the All-America Football Conference (AAFC). The AAFC was a major league, at least as strong as the early AFL (and much stronger relative to the NFL). The Cleveland Browns, San Francisco 49ers, and Baltimore Colts all began in the AAFC, and in the four-year history of the league, it produced 15 Hall of Famers. The AAFC was ahead of the NFL on racial integration, West Coast football, air travel between games, and regular use of zone defense, not to mention Paul Brown's numerous innovations. The younger league's trail-blazing forced the NFL to adapt to keep up.
The AAFC competed with the NFL for players and coaches, and came out about even. The new league not only found new talent, it poached players from NFL rosters, signed veterans returning from war, and aggressively signed college prospects, including Heisman Trophy winner Angelo Bertelli. In its first year of operation, the AAFC signed 50% more College All-Stars (40) than the NFL (26). About 100 players with NFL experience joined the AAFC: nearly a quarter of the established league defected. The AAFC also attracted Hall of Fame coaches Paul Brown and Ray Flaherty, plus future NFL Championship-winning head coach Buck Shaw and Hall of Famer Cliff Battles.
The AAFC drew higher attendance than the established league, and competed with the NFL by placing teams in Chicago, Cleveland, and New York; in each case, the AAFC team played in a larger stadium. The NFL's Rams, defending league champions, fled Cleveland for Los Angeles (where they were outdrawn by the AAFC's L.A. Dons), and the AAFC won the battle to put a football team in Yankee Stadium, a target the NFL fell short of. In 1948, the Browns, 49ers, and Dons outdrew every team in the NFL. When the two leagues merged in 1950, the opening game between the AAFC-Champion Browns and the NFL-Champion Eagles drew higher attendance (71,237) than the first NFL-AFL Super Bowl (61,946). AAFC players from contracted franchises bolstered NFL rosters — especially the Giants, who were assigned players from the AAFC's New York Yankees and Brooklyn Dodgers, including Arnie Weinmeister, Otto Schnellbacher, and Tom Landry.
It is true that Otto Graham's efficiency stats were much higher in the AAFC than the NFL. It is not true, however, that this is because the AAFC was a low-quality league; it wasn't. Even if we significantly discount AAFC performance relative to the 1940s NFL — and it's not clear that we should — but even if we do, Graham was far and away the best quarterback of the late '40s. His stats are out of this world, his team won the league championship game every year (literally), he played great in the title games, and everyone who covered football in that era agrees that Graham was the best. There's probably no other era of football in which it's so clear who was the best QB. The 1950s were more competitive, but Graham continued to lead the pack. All-pro awards, 1950-55:
1950 — Johnny Lujack
1951 — Graham
1952 — Graham and Bobby Layne
1953 — Graham
1954 — Graham
1955 — Graham
During Graham's six seasons in the NFL, the Browns went 58-13-1 (.813), played in six NFL Championship Games, and won three titles. In the three championship victories, Graham passed or ran for 14 touchdowns. When he retired in 1956, the Browns had their first losing season ever, dropping from 9-2-1 (and a previous worst of 8-4) all the way to 5-7. The team rebounded when it drafted Jim Brown the following season, but didn't win another championship until 1964, with a new coach and a new group of players: Graham's retirement ended the Cleveland Dynasty.
If the all-pro consensus, the postseason performances, and the greatest dynasty in the history of professional football don't convince you, Graham's stats also validate his primacy. From 1950-55:
Chart
* Estimated. The NFL tracked sack yardage, but not sacks, during these years.
Graham has the worst sack statistics in the group, which isn't shown above, but he leads in yardage (by over 1,000), TD/INT differential, passer rating, and total touchdowns. Statistically, his primary rival is Norm Van Brocklin, whose case rests almost exclusively on his phenomenal average yardage. Graham's yardage per attempt was identical to Van Brocklin's (both 8.6), so the difference derives exclusively from sacks. The argument for Van Brocklin is somewhat tempered by Bob Waterfield, who quarterbacked the same team during that time period. Waterfield's sack percentage was even better than Van Brocklin's, and his estimated NY/A was 7.1. Even if you buy that Waterfield and Van Brocklin had exactly the same skill set, excelling in precisely the same areas by coincidence, Graham's volume and rushing offer a compelling case in his favor.
Graham, who also played professional basketball for a championship team, was an exceptional athlete. He had great movement inside the pocket, and he was a deadly short-yardage runner, who still holds the record for most rushing TDs by a quarterback (44) — a figure that doesn't even include his six rushing TDs in the postseason. Graham may be the only quarterback famous for his peripheral vision, and he was the most accurate passer of his generation; even the normally humble Graham bragged, decades later, "I could throw a pass to a spot as well as anyone who ever lived." Graham also had great touch on his long passes; he is one of the finest deep passers of all time.
Legendary coach Paul Brown enthusiastically praised his quarterback: "Otto Graham was the key to the whole team. He had the finest peripheral vision I've ever witnessed, and that is a very big factor in a quarterback. He had total composure on the field, the ability to find whatever receiver was going to come open, and the arm and athletic ability to get the ball to him. His hand-eye coordination was most unusual, and he was bigger than you'd think and faster than you'd think." At his HOF induction in 1967, Brown chose Otto Graham to present him.
No matter what criteria you use to evaluate quarterbacks, Graham is at or near the top of the list. You like stats? By the numbers, Graham was the most dominant quarterback of his era. Awards and honors? Graham was all-pro every year, and he won five league MVP Awards in seven years — no major organization named an MVP in 1949, 1950, or 1952, all years in which he would have been a candidate. Do you believe quarterbacks win championships? Nobody won more than Otto Graham. His team made the title game every year of his career, won seven championships, and stopped winning when he retired. Graham wasn't just along for the ride, either; he's one of the greatest postseason players in history.
That synergy of evidence points to Graham as the most exceptional quarterback of all time. He excelled when the Browns leaned on Marion Motley and the run game (his 112.1 passer rating in 1946 was the single-season record for more than 40 years) and he excelled after Motley retired and the offense went through the air (NFL MVP, multiple championships). He was accurate and athletic, a threat with both his arm and his legs, and he never had a bad season. His stats were excellent in the 1950s and otherworldly in the late '40s. In only 10 seasons, he led his league in passing yards five times, TDs four times, and rating five times. Graham is dimly remembered today, because he played in a small market, before the Super Bowl and before football was widely televised, at a time when baseball players and boxers were the athletes who became legends. But there is no other QB in history who excelled so dramatically by every measure we use to evaluate quarterbacks.

2. Johnny Unitas
Baltimore Colts, 1956-72; San Diego Chargers, 1973
40,239 yards, 290 TD, 253 INT, 78.2 rating
No quarterback was more respected than John Unitas. Everyone recognized the greatness of Sammy Baugh, everyone admired the success of Otto Graham and Joe Montana, people lauded the individual accomplishments of Fran Tarkenton and Dan Marino, and no one doubts the skill of Tom Brady and Peyton Manning. But no QB in history was more universally revered than Unitas.
You can start wherever you like: his record-setting stats, his legendary two-minute drills, his three championships ... but nothing earned Unitas as much respect as his leadership and toughness. There are dozens of stories. Hall of Fame tight end John Mackey said that playing with Unitas was like being in the huddle with God. Hall of Fame DT Merlin Olsen famously mused that when the pass rush closed in, Unitas would hold the ball a split second longer than necessary, just to show he wasn't afraid of the hit. Unitas himself probably never gave a more famous quote than the one asserting his own independence and authority: "You don't arrive as a quarterback until you can tell the coach to go to hell."
Unitas explained to Paul Zimmerman that coach Weeb Ewbank "had tremendous respect for Night Train Lane. He'd tell me, 'Don't throw the ball in his area.' Well, hell, I wasn't going to give him the day off. So I'd throw at him, and maybe he'd pick one off, but we could do things against him, too."
Unitas was an aggressive passer, but resented the idea that he was a gambler. “It’s not gambling if you know what you are doing.” The quarterback's confidence was well-founded. His interception rate was very low for when he played, one of his distinguishing characteristics. He had a strong arm and he was a brilliant play-caller. Between his game management, decision-making, physical ability, and toughness, Unitas intimidated defenses rather than the other way around. Raymond Berry, Unitas' favorite receiver, summed up his teammate's excellence: "his uncanny instinct for calling the right play at the right time, his icy composure under fire, his fierce competitiveness and his utter disregard for his own safety.''
John Unitas was a classic thrower: fingers on the laces, hand beside his ear. He was also one of the first passers to deliberately underthrow receivers, what we now call the back-shoulder pass. He led the NFL in passing yards and touchdowns four times each, and retired with the all-time records for completions, yards, and TDs. Unitas made 10 Pro Bowls — the most of any quarterback for 50 years — and he was NFL MVP three times. Sorting out which organization's awards you prefer was not an exact science during Unitas' career, but a balanced reading shows him all-NFL an astonishing eight times, including five years first-team.
In a sense, Unitas was the bridge between Bobby Layne and Dan Fouts. He was just as tough as Layne, and as fierce a competitor — but he could throw like Fouts, whom he mentored when they spent a single year together: the final season for Unitas, and the rookie year for Fouts.



1. Peyton Manning
Indianapolis Colts, 1998-2011; Denver Broncos, 2012-15
71,940 yards, 539 TD, 251 INT, 96.5 rating
People have emotional reactions to Peyton Manning, in a way that doesn't apply to Otto Graham or John Unitas. But I would really appreciate if skeptical readers will hear me out on this.
Manning made 14 Pro Bowls, the record for a quarterback. He was All-Pro 10 times, which is also the record for a quarterback, and First-Team All-Pro seven times: another record. He was NFL MVP five times, which is the record. He is the only QB to win a Super Bowl with two different franchises. (Indianapolis Colts, Denver Broncos) He is — by far — the most decorated quarterback of all time.
He holds QB records for Total Wins (200), Regular Season Wins (186, Tied w/ Favre), Passing Yards (71,940 yards), TD Passes (539) and all of the distinctions that used to belong to Dan Marino: 4-TD games4000-yard seasons, and so on. Manning led the NFL in passing yards and rating three times each, and TDs four times. He holds the single-season records for yardage (5,477), touchdowns (55), and TD/INT +/- (+45), and he previously set the record for rating (121.1). He is — by far — the best statistical quarterback of all time.
Manning's detractors argue that he was always in a position to succeed, because he's been surrounded by talented teammates. There's some truth to that, of course. But I think this can be overstated, because every receiver who played with Peyton Manning turns into a superstar. Seven different receivers had a 1,000-yard season with Manning, and only one (Reggie Wayne) has had a 1,000-yard season with any other quarterback. No other QB comes close to that record: six unique 1,000-yard receivers. The next-closest is five (Tom Brady, Kurt Warner). Maybe Manning's been fortunate to play with great receivers, or maybe he's turned ordinary teammates into extraordinary ones. It's hard to separate cause and effect when every receiver who plays with Manning becomes a standout.
Manning played for five head coaches, and gone to the playoffs with all five. He was successful with Edgerrin James, and he was successful when his leading rusher gained under 500 yards. He won MVP and went to the Super Bowl with Indianapolis, and he won MVP and went to the Super Bowl with Denver. He had an all-pro, division-title season with the Colts in 1999, and he had an all-pro, division-title season with the Colts in 2009, teams with no player or coach in common besides Manning. When Manning missed the 2011 season, the Colts dropped from the 4th-ranked offense and a 10-6 record to the 30th-ranked offense and a 2-14 record. The idea that his success was a product of his supporting cast, or the dome in Indianapolis, is not supported by evidence.
Beyond the numbers, Peyton Manning is the best player I've ever seen. His command at the line of scrimmage was unique, and no QB in history was better at reading defenses. His play-action was the best I've ever seen. Arm strength, quick release, accuracy, mobility in the pocket — it's all there. One of Manning's most distinguishing assets, though, is his aggressiveness. Throws other players wouldn't try, he goes after. Sometimes he gets intercepted, and sometimes he makes plays you never imagined were possible.
What's most striking about Manning is his artistry. Several times each season, he played at a level that is almost unbelievable. In a 2013 Monday Night Football game, Manning went 32-of-37 for 374 yards, 3 TDs, and a 135.8 passer rating. Jon Gruden called him the Sheriff, because he lays down the law. Mike Tirico called him the Surgeon, because he's so precise and he puts on a clinic. After the game, Steve Young and Trent Dilfer described Manning, not as anything as crude as a sheriff, or as cold and dispassionate as a surgeon. He was a visionary, whose genius no one can fully understand or replicate. Have you ever heard a music aficionado try to explain how no one plays a Bach concerto quite like Joshua Bell, or an art expert explaining what sets Monet apart from the other Impressionists? That was their reaction to Manning's performance.
On his good days, Peyton Manning is the most amazing football player you could ever hope to see. His consistent excellence and record-shattering numbers is what separates Peyton Manning. Seeing an athlete accomplish something you never would have dreamed of — that's special, to me it's the reason we watch sports — and no quarterback in history has done that as often as Manning. Whether it's hitting the tiniest opening on the sideline, the perfect back-shoulder pass, a play-fake that fools the whole defense, finding exactly the right play on 3rd-and-8 ... Peyton Manning is not only the best quarterback I've ever seen, he was the most fun to watch.
Many of the things that separate today's best passers — Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers — from the rest of the league, they do because Peyton Manning did them first. His control of the game from the line of scrimmage was unparalleled; Manning was often described as his own offensive coordinator. Reading the defense, the adjustments he made at the line ... other players had to copy him if they were going to keep up. Manning's one-on-one work with Marvin Harrison, and later Reggie Wayne, was legendary. Would those receivers have become elite if they never played with Manning? Maybe so, but we'll never know.
Whatever luck and/or magic Manning had with his receivers, it didn't extend to defense or special teams. Only seven times in his 17-year career was Manning paired with a top-10 defense, and only three times with a defense in the top five. He had 102 wins, Regular Season and Playoffs, with a Defense 16th or worse in Pts Allowed, 28 more than the next closest QB (Dan Marino). He remains the only QB in the SB era to win a SB with a Defense ranked 20th (21st - 22.5 pts, 2006) or worse in Points Allowed. He is also the only QB to win a SB with a Defense ranked Dead Last (32nd in Run Defense and Yards Per Rush Attempt, 2006) in any statistical category and the 2006 Colts Run Defense (173.0 YPG, 5.3 YPA) was the worst of the Modern Era. In that context, his team results — 13 straight seasons of double-digit wins, four Super Bowl appearances — seem heroic rather than disappointing.
Peyton Manning was not a great postseason quarterback; he doesn't have the same résumé as Joe Montana or Otto Graham, or even John Unitas. But the idea that he "couldn't" play in the postseason is absurd. Manning had some of the greatest performances in postseason history. There have only been four perfect passer ratings in NFL playoff history, and in two of them, the passer had only half as many attempts (13) as Manning did against the 2003 Broncos, a 41-10 win for the Colts. Manning was 22-of-26 for 377 yards, 5 TDs, and no INTs or sacks, against the fourth-ranked defense in the NFL. It's arguably the best performance in playoff history.
The following week, Manning went 22-of-30 for 304 yards, 3 TDs, and 0 INTs, powering a 38-31 shootout victory at Arrowhead Stadium. He passed for 458 yds, 4 TDs, and a 145.7 rating in a playoff game the next year. He led the biggest comeback in Conference Championship Game history (18 points against the Patriots) and won a Super Bowl MVP Award against one of the best defenses of the past decade (the 2006 Chicago Bears). He dominated the exceptional 2009 Jets defense in the AFC Championship Game (377 yds, 3 TD, 123.6 rating), another double-digit comeback. Manning was the only player all season — 19 games altogether — to throw 3 TD passes against the Jets, and Indy's 461 yards were the most the Jets allowed all season. In Denver, Manning helped the Broncos earn a Super Bowl appearance with his 400-yard, 2-TD, no-INT AFC Championship Game against the Patriots. In 2015, he became the oldest starting QB ever to win a SB. (39 years old) He has some bad games in the postseason, but he also has some excellent games.
For some reason, the bad ones seem to stick to Manning's reputation in a way that hasn't happened to other elite QBs. Graham went 2-of-15 for 20 yards, with no touchdowns and two interceptions, in the 1953 Championship Game. Unitas' Colts got shut out in the '64 title game, and he committed three turnovers in his only Super Bowl win. Montana's 49ers scored just three points in back-to-back playoff losses against the Giants, then he got benched for and outplayed by Steve Young against the Vikings. Tom Brady, Troy Aikman, Terry Bradshaw ... they all have some bad postseason performances. As Chase Stuart wrote last year, "For most quarterbacks, ugly playoff performances are quirks of history; for Manning, they become bullet points in a character assassination." It also surprises me that so many people blame Manning, rather than Tony Dungy, for the Colts' postseason losses. Here's a breakdown of Manning's postseason record:
Super Bowl: 2-2
AFC Championship: 4-1
Divisional, without bye: 2-1
Divisional, with bye: 3-5
Wild Card: 3-4
One of those stats jumps out, I think. Dungy routinely rested his starters in Week 17, giving his rhythm-based offense three weeks between games, with devastating results. When they win their first playoff game, Manning's teams were 8-4 in the later rounds, when competition should be most difficult. Dungy mishandled his personnel, he was too conservative in big games, and he was badly outcoached by Bill Belichick, Bill Cowher, Norv Turner and even his old assistant Herman Edwards. Like Don Shula, Dungy was a great coach, but one whose postseason record leaves a lot to be desired, and who bears some responsibility for failing to turn astonishing quarterback play into postseason success. Peyton Manning is the only quarterback in history to reach the Super Bowl with four different head coaches (Dungy, Jim Caldwell, John Fox and Gary Kubiak). Manning never played for a coach like Paul Brown, Bill Walsh, or Bill Belichick.
Let's be clear: I do not believe that Manning was a great postseason QB, and I'm not trying to pretend that he never laid an egg in the playoffs. But he wasn't a disaster or a choker. He's tied with Bradshaw and Elway for 3rd All-Time in career postseason wins (14), he was Super Bowl MVP, and he had some of the finest performances in playoff history. Playing poorly in the postseason is not some defining characteristic of his career, because it's a perception that is not based in reality.
Manning's postseason record is not as good as Montana's or Graham's, but his many positive achievements easily outweigh a playoff record that is just over .500. Manning's teams have made the playoffs 15 times, more than any other QB in history (Tom Brady, 13). He's won 186 games as starter, tying Favre for the most ever. He set virtually every statistical record a quarterback would want, and subjective evaluation has honored him at least as strongly as the stats, with record numbers of Pro Bowl, All-Pro, and MVP recognitions.

Quarterback debates can be silly. We don’t wonder why Barry Sanders never won a Super Bowl. The  legacy of Jim Brown wasn’t tarnished even though he didn’t win a playoff game until his second-to-last season. Manning is the greatest quarterback in NFL history. That’s his legacy. He’s earned that label after reaching unparalleled levels of success, by producing at a level well above average, game after game, month after month, season after season. It’s a bit odd that Manning’s teams haven’t had more success in the playoffs, but that’s all it is. Ted Williams never won a World Series, but it doesn’t make him any less of a ballplayer. Even Boston fans can agree with that. We are told that quarterbacks are different, and that a quarterback is responsible for his team’s success. But constant repetition does not make it so. We’re smart enough to know this; I know we are.  

Peyton Manning played 17 seasons, 266 games, 293 if you count postseason. The idea that everything he's accomplished can be invalidated by 13 games, that those 13 games could outweight the other 280, is — for lack of a better word — nuts. An up-and-down playoff career is part of Manning's legacy, but it cannot, by itself, define our evaluation. If you're going to dismiss the most influential quarterback of the Modern Era, a player who won five MVPs, set important single-season and career records, turned every receiver he played with into a superstar, took the fewest sacks in history, ran the best two-minute drill, and got his team to the playoffs every year, if you're going to throw all that out the window because of a handful of playoff games, you're missing the greatest quarterback of all time.
"Peyton Manning isn't a kid anymore, Youth doesn't last forever. But LEGENDS do." - NFL Films